
	Search Site Map TLC Home SL Home ED Home ASD Home EOSJ Home SDP Home Graduate Attributes Murdoch

	Unit Materials Flexible Teaching Media Production Surveys & Evaluations VC's Excellence Awards Carrick (ALTC) Funding

	About IRES Unit & Teaching Surveys Divisional & Uni Survey Results Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) Results

Student Surveys of Units

University-wide Results for Internal Students

2003

Number of units = 420

Number of responses = 12,829

Average response rate = 60%

**RESOURCES. The unit resources (print materials, tapes, on-line, etc.) were available...**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	before the beginning of semester	3334	26.0	29.6	29.6
	during week 1	3952	30.8	35.1	64.6
	week 2 or later	1461	11.4	13.0	77.6
	unsure	2524	19.7	22.4	100.0
	Total	11271	87.9	100.0
Missing	System	1558	12.1
Total		12829	100.0

**Statistics**
	N		Mean	Std. Deviation
	Valid	Missing	Mean	Std. Deviation
Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit.	12598	231	3.07	.710
Q2. The assessed work was appropriate to the learning objectives.	12322	507	3.15	.625
Q3. The work I submitted was marked and returned in a reasonable time.	11772	1057	3.20	.687
Q4. The feedback on my marked work was useful	11103	1726	3.07	.759
Q5. Activities in this unit enhanced my knowledge and/or skills in the subject area	12452	377	3.21	.665
Q6. The assessment tasks tested my understanding of the subject area, rather than just memory.	12219	610	3.19	.674
Q7. The workload was reasonable	12589	240	3.03	.706
Q8. The unit resources directed me to other information sources, eg books, journals, web pages, etc.	12016	813	3.13	.670
Q9. The unit resources were well organised and easy to follow	12415	414	3.05	.729
Q10. Staff were adequately accessible outside classes/to external students.	9657	3172	3.15	.702
Q11. During the unit I was given an opportunity to provide feedback on the unit to staff.	11034	1795	3.03	.696
Q12. I was given information on changes made to the unit in response to feedback from (past or current) students.	8968	3861	2.64	.806
Q13. Overall, I was satisfied with the quality of teaching in this unit.	12517	312	3.16	.725
Q14. Overall, I was satisfied with the quality of this unit.	12570	259	3.11	.741

**Q1. It was clear what I was expected to learn in this unit.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	3215	25.1	25.5	25.5
	agree	7390	57.6	58.7	84.2
	disagree	1592	12.4	12.6	96.8
	strongly disagree	401	3.1	3.2	100.0
	Total	12598	98.2	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	122	1.0
	System	109	.8
	Total	231	1.8
Total		12829	100.0

**Q2. The assessed work was appropriate to the learning objectives.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	3264	25.4	26.5	26.5
	agree	7866	61.3	63.8	90.3
	disagree	978	7.6	7.9	98.3
	strongly disagree	214	1.7	1.7	100.0
	Total	12322	96.0	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	407	3.2
	System	100	.8
	Total	507	4.0
Total		12829	100.0

**Q3. The work I submitted was marked and returned in a reasonable time.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	3884	30.3	33.0	33.0
	agree	6667	52.0	56.6	89.6
	disagree	915	7.1	7.8	97.4
	strongly disagree	306	2.4	2.6	100.0
	Total	11772	91.8	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	935	7.3
	System	122	1.0
	Total	1057	8.2
Total		12829	100.0

**Q4. The feedback on my marked work was useful**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	3194	24.9	28.8	28.8
	agree	5934	46.3	53.4	82.2
	disagree	1547	12.1	13.9	96.1
	strongly disagree	428	3.3	3.9	100.0
	Total	11103	86.5	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	1571	12.2
	System	155	1.2
	Total	1726	13.5
Total		12829	100.0

**Q5. Activities in this unit enhanced my knowledge and/or skills in the subject area**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	4106	32.0	33.0	33.0
	agree	7102	55.4	57.0	90.0
	disagree	1007	7.8	8.1	98.1
	strongly disagree	237	1.8	1.9	100.0
	Total	12452	97.1	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	300	2.3
	System	77	.6
	Total	377	2.9
Total		12829	100.0

**Q6. The assessment tasks tested my understanding of the subject area, rather than just memory.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	3928	30.6	32.1	32.1
	agree	6989	54.5	57.2	89.3
	disagree	1041	8.1	8.5	97.9
	strongly disagree	261	2.0	2.1	100.0
	Total	12219	95.2	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	507	4.0
	System	103	.8
	Total	610	4.8
Total		12829	100.0

**Q7. The workload was reasonable**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	2826	22.0	22.4	22.4
	agree	7847	61.2	62.3	84.8
	disagree	1399	10.9	11.1	95.9
	strongly disagree	517	4.0	4.1	100.0
	Total	12589	98.1	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	107	.8
	System	133	1.0
	Total	240	1.9
Total		12829	100.0

**Q8. The unit resources directed me to other information sources, eg books, journals, web pages, etc.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	3352	26.1	27.9	27.9
	agree	7011	54.6	58.3	86.2
	disagree	1461	11.4	12.2	98.4
	strongly disagree	192	1.5	1.6	100.0
	Total	12016	93.7	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	699	5.4
	System	114	.9
	Total	813	6.3
Total		12829	100.0

**Q9. The unit resources were well organised and easy to follow**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	3140	24.5	25.3	25.3
	agree	7164	55.8	57.7	83.0
	disagree	1654	12.9	13.3	96.3
	strongly disagree	457	3.6	3.7	100.0
	Total	12415	96.8	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	277	2.2
	System	137	1.1
	Total	414	3.2
Total		12829	100.0

**Q10. Staff were adequately accessible outside classes/to external students.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	2939	22.9	30.4	30.4
	agree	5525	43.1	57.2	87.6
	disagree	910	7.1	9.4	97.1
	strongly disagree	283	2.2	2.9	100.0
	Total	9657	75.3	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	2876	22.4
	System	296	2.3
	Total	3172	24.7
Total		12829	100.0

**Q11. During the unit I was given an opportunity to provide feedback on the unit to staff.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	2568	20.0	23.3	23.3
	agree	6553	51.1	59.4	82.7
	disagree	1623	12.7	14.7	97.4
	strongly disagree	290	2.3	2.6	100.0
	Total	11034	86.0	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	1663	13.0
	System	132	1.0
	Total	1795	14.0
Total		12829	100.0

**Q12. I was given information on changes made to the unit in response to feedback from (past or current) students.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	1227	9.6	13.7	13.7
	agree	3925	30.6	43.8	57.4
	disagree	3163	24.7	35.3	92.7
	strongly disagree	653	5.1	7.3	100.0
	Total	8968	69.9	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	3583	27.9
	System	278	2.2
	Total	3861	30.1
Total		12829	100.0

**Q13. Overall, I was satisfied with the quality of teaching in this unit.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	4078	31.8	32.6	32.6
	agree	6806	53.1	54.4	87.0
	disagree	1230	9.6	9.8	96.8
	strongly disagree	403	3.1	3.2	100.0
	Total	12517	97.6	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	163	1.3
	System	149	1.2
	Total	312	2.4
Total		12829	100.0

**Q14. Overall, I was satisfied with the quality of this unit.**
		Frequency	Percent	Valid Percent	Cumulative Percent
Valid	strongly agree	3730	29.1	29.7	29.7
	agree	6945	54.1	55.3	84.9
	disagree	1420	11.1	11.3	96.2
	strongly disagree	475	3.7	3.8	100.0
	Total	12570	98.0	100.0
Missing	unable to judge	119	.9
	System	140	1.1
	Total	259	2.0
Total		12829	100.0

Student Surveys Index